Journal article
Kara B. Dassel, Jorie M. Butler, Jacqueline Telonidis, L. Edelman
2020
2020
Semantic Scholar
DOI
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Dassel, K. B., Butler, J. M., Telonidis, J., & Edelman, L. (2020). Development and evaluation of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) best care practices in long-term care online training program.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Dassel, Kara B., Jorie M. Butler, Jacqueline Telonidis, and L. Edelman. “Development and Evaluation of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) Best Care Practices in Long-Term Care Online Training Program” (2020).
MLA
Click to copy
Dassel, Kara B., et al. Development and Evaluation of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) Best Care Practices in Long-Term Care Online Training Program. 2020.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{kara2020a,
title = {Development and evaluation of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) best care practices in long-term care online training program},
year = {2020},
author = {Dassel, Kara B. and Butler, Jorie M. and Telonidis, Jacqueline and Edelman, L.}
}
Abstract
ABSTRACT We developed online training modules focused on Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) designed to improve best care practices in long-term care settings, such as nursing homes, as a part of a federal grant focused on improving geriatric education for interprofessional (collaboration among different professions providing patient care) team members working in primary care settings. Faculty and clinicians with ADRD-expertise created and implemented an online asynchronous “ADRD Best Care Practices in Long-Term Care” program that includes audio-visual recorded presentations, a threaded case study, and supplemental information. Prior to enrolling in the course, participants complete a demographic survey and a modified 15-item version of the Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge Scale. After completing the modules, participants complete a satisfaction survey and the ADKS. A total of 94 participants completed both the pre- and post-surveys. Satisfaction evaluation data showed that the majority of participants reported that the information presented was very clear (74.5%), was useful for their work (88.3%), and would improve the care that they provide to their geriatric patients (93.6%). Out of 15 possible.
